Flash flood impacts nowcasting within the PICS project (2018-2022): End-users involvement and first results
Date
Authors
Payrastre, Olivier
Boudevillain, Brice
Bourgin, François
Bouttier, François
Caumont, Olivier
Charpentier-Noyer, Maryse
Ducrocq, Veronique
Fleury, Axelle
Garambois, Pierre-André
Gaume, Eric
Hocini, Nabil
Janet, Bruno
Jay-Allemand, Maxime
Lague, Dimitri
Lovat, Alexane
Moncoulon, David
Naulin, Jean-Philippe
Nicolle, Pierre
Peredo, Daniela
Perrin, Charles
Pons, Frédéric
Ramos, Maria-Helena
Ruin, Isabelle
Terti, Galateia
Type
Language
Reading access rights:
Rights Holder
Conference Date
Conference Place
Conference Title
Container Title
Version
Subject (OSZKAR)
ungauged
warning system
Gender
- Cite this item
- https://doi.org/10.3311/FloodRisk2020.17.3
OOC works
Abstract
Flash-flood events can have catastrophic socio-economic consequences. To reduce their impacts, it is of crucial importance to set up efficient warning systems. Although first operational flash-flood warning systems have recently been implemented, some limitations are clearly identified by end-users: non-exhaustive geographic coverage, limited lead times, warnings based on hazard assessment instead of risk. However, the desirable improvements raise real scientific challenges in various domains. In this context, the PICS (Prevision immediate des impacts des crues soudaines – Flash-flood events impacts nowcasting - 2018-2022) project gathers French scientific teams with varied skills (meteorologists, hydrologists, hydraulicians, economists, social geographers) and operational stakeholders (civil security, local authorities, insurance companies, managers of hydroelectric facilities and transport network). Funded by the French national research agency (ANR), it aims to develop and evaluate pre-operational forecasting chains able to estimate the potential impacts of flash floods with short anticipation lead times (up to 6 hours). These modelling chains include different components. Distributed hydrological models transform the observed and forecasted rainfall into runoff. Hydraulic models translate this runoff into potential flooded areas. Impact models incorporate these results to evaluate the potential for social and economic impacts. The research and operational partners selected four case studies based on various criteria, including the occurrence of human impacts and damages, the availability of validation data. Validation data include discharges recorded at gauging stations, but also more original information collected after each event, such as peak discharges and maximum water levels estimated from flood marks, insurance claims, damages observed on infrastructure (roads, railway…), victims interviews, casualties,etc. This presentation focuses on the methodology used for the involvement of representative potential end-users, leading to fruitfull dialogues and informative outcomes. Some of the first results of the project are also presented.