Műegyetemi Digitális Archívum
 

Comparative Study of Three 4D Simulation Software

Date

Type

könyvfejezet

Language

en

Reading access rights:

Open access

Rights Holder

Szerző

Conference Date

2024.06.29.-2024.07.02

Conference Place

Praha, Czech Republic

Conference Title

Creative Construction Conference 2024

ISBN, e-ISBN

978-615-5270-78-9

Container Title

Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2024

Department

Építéstechnológia és Menedzsment Tanszék

Version

Online

Faculty

Faculty of Architecture

Subject Area

Műszaki tudományok

Subject Field

építészmérnöki tudományok

Subject (OSZKAR)

building information modeling
construction planning
4D simulation

Gender

Konferenciacikk

University

Budapest University of Technology and Economics

OOC works

Abstract

The gradual adoption of Four-dimensional (4D) simulation and its benefits underscore the increased interest in leveraging all its capabilities. Although widely used in AEC projects, 4D simulation tools are still explored for their ease of use, features, and potential. This report presents a comparative study of three 4D simulation software programs: Navisworks Manage, Synchro 4D Pro, and Fuzor. The analysis aims to evaluate their respective effectiveness for 4D simulation based on several criteria grouped into four main categories: collaborative features, 4D features, 3D features, and planning features. Regarding collaborative features, all three tools have comparable strengths, particularly in terms of file import and export. Navisworks Manage stands out for its compatibility with over 60 file formats, while Synchro and Fuzor distinguish themselves with their plug-in system, in addition to compatibility with certain formats, including IFC. In terms of 4D features, Fuzor takes the lead with its extensive capabilities and possibilities. Navisworks ranks second, meeting all criteria in this category, unlike Synchro, which is slightly behind due to its limitations. In terms of 3D features, Fuzor also excels, offering the ability not only to create 3D models but also to fully meet established criteria. Synchro follows, having an advantage over Navisworks with its ability to modify integrated models, even if only through simple subdivisions. Finally, for planning aspects, Fuzor and Synchro stand out for their numerous features, while Navisworks is in last place, offering more limited options for planning development.

Description

Keywords