Műegyetemi Digitális Archívum
 

Health and Safety (H&S) Specifications: H&S Practitioners’ Experiences

Date

Type

könyvfejezet

Language

en

Reading access rights:

Open access

Rights Holder

Szerző

Conference Date

2024.06.29.-2024.07.02

Conference Place

Praha, Czech Republic

Conference Title

Creative Construction Conference 2024

ISBN, e-ISBN

978-615-5270-78-9

Container Title

Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2024

Department

Építéstechnológia és Menedzsment Tanszék

Version

Online

Faculty

Faculty of Architecture

Subject Area

Műszaki tudományok

Subject Field

építészmérnöki tudományok

Subject (OSZKAR)

Construction
Health and Safety
Specification

Gender

Konferenciacikk

University

Budapest University of Technology and Economics

OOC works

Abstract

An H&S specification must be provided to designers by the client in terms of the Construction Regulations. The designers in turn must take the H&S specification into account and provide the client with a report as a response thereto. Furthermore, clients must provide principal contractors (PCs) with an H&S specification (contractor) as part of the tender documentation. Successful PCs in turn must evolve an H&S plan in response thereto, which must be discussed with and approved by the client before the PC commences work on site. The study reported on, investigated practices relative to ‘contractor’ H&S specifications. The sample strata included members of the Association of Construction Health and Safety Management (ACHASM), and delegates attending H&S specification workshops. Findings include: quality is more important than H&S; H&S specifications are provided on approximately 71.4% of projects; H&S specifications are marginally project specific; short, average, and long H&S specifications are encountered by respondents’ organisations; 52.9% of aspects / issues that should be addressed in H&S specifications are addressed frequently, whereas 47.1% are addressed infrequently; existing services, and H&S file predominate in terms of the aspects / issues addressed frequently; the statement ‘H&S specifications should be a useful reference’ attracted the highest level of concurrence, and a range of project stakeholders are incapable of compiling H&S specifications. Conclusions include: H&S specifications are not managed, evolved, and comprehensive in terms of the Construction Regulations; the potential contribution of H&S specifications to managing H&S is not being realised, and there is a lack of competencies in terms of compiling H&S specifications. Recommendations include: a standard should be prepared in terms of H&S specifications; built environment professional associations and statutory councils should promote continuing professional development (CPD) relative to H&S specifications, and H&S specifications should be reviewed in terms of compliance by principal agents.

Description

Keywords